Which is easier to get started on — DataAnnotation or Prolific?

Prolific is easier — you create an account, fill out a demographic profile, and immediately see available studies. There are no qualification tests or skill assessments. DataAnnotation requires passing project-specific tests before accessing tasks. Both are beginner-friendly relative to higher-tier platforms like Mercor or Toptal, but Prolific has the lower friction onboarding.

Does DataAnnotation pay more than Prolific?

Yes, substantially. DataAnnotation pays $15–40/hr compared to Prolific's $6–18/hr. DataAnnotation's higher rates reflect the more cognitively demanding work and qualification requirements. Prolific's minimum hourly guarantee (~$11/hr) is competitive for truly passive work, but DataAnnotation workers with domain expertise earn significantly more.

Can I do DataAnnotation and Prolific at the same time?

Yes. There are no exclusivity requirements on either platform. Many workers use both: DataAnnotation for focused work sessions where they want maximum earnings per hour, and Prolific for lighter survey work during breaks or downtime. The two platforms are genuinely complementary from a time-allocation standpoint.

DataAnnotation vs Prolific: Which Is Better in 2026?

DataAnnotation vs Prolific: Honest Comparison

DataAnnotation and Prolific both offer remote income that doesn't require deep technical expertise, but they serve genuinely different purposes. DataAnnotation is an AI training platform where workers complete annotation, RLHF, and content review tasks that feed directly into LLM development. Prolific is an academic research platform where participants complete surveys and experiments for university and industry researchers.

These platforms are more complementary than competitive. Workers who use one often benefit from using the other as a supplement, since the work types, hours, and skills overlap very little.

Side-by-Side Comparison

DataAnnotationVSProlific

DataAnnotation

Pay Range

$20-60/hr

Reliability

Reliable

Onboarding Time

1-2 days

Payment Frequency

weekly

Best For

Beginners looking to break into AI training work

Pros

Very easy onboarding (1-2 days)
Flexible scheduling
Large number of available projects
Good entry point for AI work

Cons

Pay Analysis

DataAnnotation pays $15–40/hr on a task-by-task basis with weekly payments. Rates are higher than most annotation platforms, particularly for RLHF, code review, and domain-specific tasks. Strong writing or domain knowledge in coding, science, or law can push earnings toward the top of the range. US/UK/CA focus limits international availability.

Prolific pays $6–18/hr effective rate, with a platform-enforced minimum of approximately £9/hr (around $11/hr) for all studies. The ceiling is well below DataAnnotation's, but the barrier to entry is also far lower — no qualification tests, no domain expertise required. Payments process within 24–48 hours of study completion, which is faster than DataAnnotation's weekly cycle.

DataAnnotation pays significantly more per hour than Prolific, but the work requires more effort, domain knowledge, and passing qualification tests. Prolific is genuinely passive income compared to DataAnnotation's active cognitive work. For maximizing hourly earnings, DataAnnotation wins; for maximizing income per unit of mental effort, Prolific is surprisingly competitive.

Available Job Types

DataAnnotation focuses on AI training tasks: text annotation, RLHF training data creation, code evaluation, prompt quality review, and content categorization. The work is moderately demanding cognitively — you're making judgment calls about AI model quality, not just clicking boxes. Domain expertise in writing, coding, or science unlocks higher-paying projects.

Prolific offers varied research participation: surveys, cognitive experiments, behavioral studies, decision-making tasks, UX studies, and online experiments. The work is passive and varied — no two studies are the same. Academic compliance requirements mean researcher conduct is regulated, providing a more structured and respectful environment than some annotation platforms.

Who Should Choose Which?

Choose DataAnnotation if you...

You're in the US, UK, or Canada and want the highest per-hour return on your time
You have domain expertise (writing, coding, science) that qualifies you for premium DataAnnotation tasks
You want weekly payments and can engage in focused annotation work sessions
You want to build AI training skills that grow in value over time

Choose Prolific if you...

You want easy, low-effort supplemental income that fits around your main job or studies
You want the fastest possible payments (24–48 hours vs weekly)
You're in the UK or Europe where Prolific study availability is excellent
You want varied work — different tasks every time rather than similar annotation loops

Our Verdict

Bottom Line

Use DataAnnotation as your primary income source if you qualify for it and want to maximize earnings. Use Prolific as a low-effort supplement for passive income during downtime. The platforms serve different purposes and different work styles — there is no reason to limit yourself to one. Many workers run both and shift attention based on task availability and their available mental energy. View DataAnnotation → · View Prolific →

DAILY JOB ALERTS

Never Miss a High-Paying AI Job

Get a daily digest of new high-paying AI roles. ML, data science, and AI training opportunities — delivered straight to your inbox.

No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.